“How to Make Oral Exams Work for You” is the optimistic title of a recent Chronicle of Higher Education article aimed at AI-bedeviled professors (September 17th online).
But let’s be realistic. A review of questions from oral exams at colleges and universities around the country suggests that rigorous academic standards are frequently being compromised across a variety of disciplines. Consider the following 10 examples that we have verified here at University Life:
College of William and Mary (Astronomy 215): “How do you feel about stars? How do you think they feel about you?”
Boston University (Clinical Psychology 460): “For whom is the phrase Freudian Slip named? Hint: the name rhymes with Floyd.”
Amherst College (Philosophy 364): “Which one of the following is not like the others: Spinoza, Aristotle, Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Bad Bunny?”
Harvard University (Sociology 212): “Discuss the writing of James Baldwin in a way that would not result in your being sued by the Department of Education for DEI violations.”
College of Charleston (World Religions 112): “If Judaism were a breakfast cereal, would it contain sugar? Explain.”
Northwestern University (Civil Engineering 617): “Are bridges more important than tunnels? Why, or why not?”
Carnegie Mellon University (Physics 310): “Is String Theory compatible with the notion that Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ, was a virgin?”
Columbia University (Political Science 200): “Which four members of President Trump’s cabinet — past or present — most resemble Hermann Göring, Heinrich Himmler, Joseph Goebbels, and Eva Braun?”
Bucknell University (Chemistry 137): “Why is the Periodic Table a table, rather than a folding chair or sofa? Your answer should demonstrate an understanding of both chemistry and furniture.”
Syracuse University (English 414): “Discuss three novels other than Don Quixote that feature windmills.”
It may be time to bring back those blue books.










